(Adjust previous/next navigation) |
(Change <tt> to <code>, perhaps also minor tweak.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|previous=781 |
|previous=781 |
||
|next=784 |
|next=784 |
||
| − | |created=September 5, 2004 |
+ | |created=2004 |
|complexity=basic |
|complexity=basic |
||
|author=Aron Stansvik |
|author=Aron Stansvik |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
| − | That will map <tt><Leader>e</tt> to search backwards for the definition of the entity under the cursor, then you can just CTRL-o back to where you were. Makes reading DTDs less painful. |
+ | That will map <code><Leader>e</code> to search backwards for the definition of the entity under the cursor, then you can just CTRL-o back to where you were. Makes reading DTDs less painful. |
==Comments== |
==Comments== |
||
created 2004 · complexity basic · author Aron Stansvik · version 5.7
This is what I use when reading/editing DTDs that make use of entities heavily:
:map <Leader>e yiw ?<!ENTITY % <C-R>"<CR>
That will map <Leader>e to search backwards for the definition of the entity under the cursor, then you can just CTRL-o back to where you were. Makes reading DTDs less painful.
Edit