(Created page with "{{ScriptComments|fortran.vim : Additional indentation rules for Fortran 95 and Fortran 90}} == Bug: Indent of bare "recursive function" does not work properly == To fix this, ...") |
JohnBeckett (talk | contribs) (Standard format.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ScriptComments|fortran |
+ | {{ScriptComments|fortran: additional indentation rules for Fortran 95 and Fortran 90}} |
− | |||
− | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
To fix this, change line 57 in fortran.vim from |
To fix this, change line 57 in fortran.vim from |
||
+ | <pre> |
||
− | |||
⚫ | |||
− | <code> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
to |
to |
||
+ | <pre> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | --May 3, 2012 |
||
⚫ | |||
− | <code> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
⚫ |
Revision as of 08:14, 4 May 2012
Use this page to discuss script 2299 fortran: additional indentation rules for Fortran 95 and Fortran 90
- Add constructive comments, bug reports, or discuss improvements (see the guideline).
- Do not document the script here (the author should do that on vim.org).
- This page may be out of date: check the script's vim.org page above, and its release notes.
Bug: Indent of bare "recursive function" does not work properly
To fix this, change line 57 in fortran.vim from
if line =~? '^\s*\(\(recursive\s*\)\=pure\|elemental\)\=\s*subroutine'
to
if line =~? '^\s*\(recursive\s*\)\=\(pure\|elemental\)\=\s*subroutine'
--May 3, 2012